Tuesday, 26 October 2010

#268 Domaine Comte Georges de Vogüé

Go on, describe love.  Describe something that is so unique and so personal with words, and I will bet you can’t.  You may come up with phrases like ‘cannot live without’, or ‘everything I could ever need’ but these are just words that describe views that you have.  You can’t actually describe love.  A similar experience happened to me in Edinburgh last week, when I tried to describe some of the wines from Domaine Comte Georges de Vogüé.

Much like love, these wines generated such a lot of complex feelings, memories and emotions in me, they were bordering on impossible to describe, and if I tried, they sound ridiculous from a punter’s point of view!  I know that wine appreciation should be personal, and I frequently describe claret as an old, dusty library, as it reminds me of my friend’s library in his own house, but each of these wines made me think of scenarios or people which are exceptionally personal.  I needed help to analyse these wines, and to be honest, educate me.  Fortunately, I was sitting with Adam Brett-Smith of Corney & Barrow and Jean-Luc Pepin of de Vogüé, and without their guidance, I may have still been languishing in confusion in the Michelin star restaurant, Number One in Edinburgh.  Actually, I can think of worse places to be languishing….

I was there for a dinner with the great and the good of Scottish wine, retailers, sommeliers and restaurateurs were gathered with some of C&B’s private clients.  I was presented with seven wines from this legendary producer, but they weren’t current release wines.  Here were a group of older wines, some from good years, other from ‘challenging’ vintages, yet all – no exceptions – were phenomenal. 

We started off with a pair of whites.  The 1999 Bourgogne Blanc and the 1992 Musigny Blanc, of which Comte Georges de Vogüé are the only producer.  Now these two wines are from the same vineyard, but where the Musigny was produced of fruit from vines planted just after the Second World War, the Bourgogne Blanc is from younger plantings from the late 1980’s, which are viewed as too young to go into their unique Musigny.  In time these grapes will go over to the Musigny, but at the moment they declassify them and pop them into the Bourgogne Blanc. 

And this 1999 wine was fantastic.  It reminded me of my bed in winter.  You get into bed and it is very unforgiving, cold and not what you want it to be.  Then with time, it warms up and becomes a cosy, delightful experience, and this wine was exactly the same.  Despite this wine’s initial silky aroma, soft hints of vanilla oak, floral too with herbal elements, it wasn’t showing the depth and warmth from the fruit that I wanted.  An initial hint of alcohol, caressed with oak, and a very soft, pithy tropical fruit element made it a nice drink but not outstanding. With time in the glass and a bit of warmth, it developed a stunning rich honey aroma, with more oak coming out, and a pineapple and lime element. A lovely velvety texture came on the palate, with more sweet thyme and a gorgeous minerality.  It really is a wine to get lost in, much like a nice warm bed, as you see it evolve more and more throughout an evening.  A fantastic wine.  9/10

The 1992 Musigny is that warm bed from the start!  It had a rich, marmalade aroma, with mango and old champagne leaping out of the glass.  There was some pine resin, some rosemary and muted oregano coming out too.  The palate was a stunning melody of fruit and a mouthful of elegant old flavours just mingling around one another, that made it difficult to pull them apart to describe.  I managed to get pineapple peel, some citrus but mainly with a gorgeous savoury element and a wonderful slight tannin that surprised but was welcomed.  At room temperature, it transformed to a honey texture with a warm prickle of alcohol that just reminds you that although this is an old wine, it is still youthful and has a bit (not a lot though) to go.  This wine is so delightful, you just don’t want it to end, in the same way as come the morning, you really don’t want to get out of bed! 10/10

With the next course, we started with a 1990 Chambolle Musigny, a wonderful old wine, reminding me of a hug from a wrinkly old granny!  A floral aroma coming off it (much like your granny) with old leather, coffee and a little menthol.  The palate has an oriental spice and green chilli, with coffee bean and violets too and so perfectly balanced. 10/10  Much in the same way as there are secrets about your granny that you rarely discover (like she was a sleeper spy against the Nazi’s or something equally exciting), this wine has a secret.  It is made with fruit from Musigny vines that are under 25 years old, but are declassified as they aren’t up to the standard of the Grand Cru wine.

The 2001 vintage of this wine is simply a younger version of the old granny!  It shows the quality and the embracing nature of the older wine, just a bit more youthful.  Lots of strawberry and raspberry fruit, spearmint and summer flower aromas, all leading onto a silky palate, light elements of leather and with nuances of tomato.  An equally wonderful wine that just loses out to the 1990 because of its youth.  9/10

I get frustrated with the Bordeaux classification system (stay with me, dear reader, you will see where I’m going in a minute), not because it is massively out of date, but because people ‘boost up’ wines.  I refer of course to the ‘super seconds’, the likes of Leoville las Cases and Ducru Beaucaillou that are considered better than their fellow second growths and have been dubbed the ‘B+’ category of Bordeaux.  They may well be better than their contemporaries, but anyone who knows about wine will be aware of this fact, and the term ‘super seconds’, which sounds like a factory clearance shop, is, in my mind, a bit surplus to requirements.

However, when this next wine was described as “Super Premiere Cru”, I had to agree, in that the 1991 Chambolle Musigny 1er Cru Les Amoureuses does hit the Grand Cru level of quality.  It starts off quite muted, but then it opens up into a melody of mint, cherries, raspberry and chocolate.  A chunky palate, with spice and leather coming to the fore and then backed up by stone fruit and veggie flavours – definite green beans!  It was a bigger, more powerful wine that showed qualities that are leagues above similarly rated wines, so the ‘super premiere cru’ rating is entirely just. 9/10

The next wine on the list was my favourite.  Not because it was the most elegant, or the best, but because it was totally open, honest and allowed you to explore it, and get all the rewards from it.  The 1990 Bonnes Mares Grand Cru was quite chunky, with lots of ripe berries, brambles and yet, an aroma of black tea and mint.  It was, to quote Jean-Luc Pepin, and “extrovert” of a wine, quite showy, but after over analyzing the previous wines, a simple one to digest the merits of was exactly what I needed.  The palate had lovely warm fruit, a touch of alcohol coming through, but lots of tannin and flavours that included coffee, stone fruit, bramble stalk and a tiny bit of chocolate.  It was a very chewable wine, a thick texture, and the finish was sitting in your mouth for an age.  A massive, generous wine.  9/10

Finally, as with most high end red Burgundy tastings, along came the Musigny.  This Musigny was the 1999 Vieilles Vignes. Vogüé own 7.2 hectares of the 10.1 hectares that make up Musigny, and the 1999 was, by their admission, “a phenomenal year”.  It was a super pretty wine, with a beautiful flower aroma, so pure, elegant and simple.  But then the power comes through, dark berries, a stunning spice element, but even though it is powerful, it is delivered with a finesse so you don’t notice it, and reminded me of a vintage port being drunk at the perfect moment for this reason.  At this point, I was having trouble analyzing this wine, so I just gave up and enjoyed perfection.

I know these wines are above most people’s price range, they certainly are mine!  I also know that I’m privileged to be able to not only sample these wines, but do so free of charge, and, if we were to believe Robert Parker, my opinion would therefore be tarnished by the fact that I would feel obliged to score these wines highly as I’d been wined and dined by Corney & Barrow.

I know this not to be the case, as I’ve slated plenty of freebies in the past, but in situations like this, when you are presented with a range of outstanding wines, it is difficult to sound impartial and objective.  I had a great night, with great company – that is what I am obliged to Corney & Barrow for. 

My views on the wines, however, are not bias as they would have been legendary if I’d drunk them with chicken nuggets.

By Peter Wood with No comments

Saturday, 23 October 2010

#267 Six Questions with... Simon Farr

Simon Farr, along with Michael Saunders and Ben Collins (no, not the racing driver recently unmasked as Top Gear's Stig), started wine importers, Bibendum, in the early 1980's in a disused petrol station!  Their intention was to sell lots of 'funky unusual stuff' alongside more traditional wines directly to customers.  In the (nearly) 30 years between then and now, Bibendum has grown into one of (if not the) biggest wine importer in the UK with a turnover of £120million per year. 

I met with him, by chance, when he popped into my shop in St Andrews and although he may run one of the biggest wine importers in the UK, he was a very friendly, unassuming, gentleman, with a real passion for wine.  The Tasting Note asked him six questions...

What got you into the wine trade? 
Parents of a friend from school bought a very run down chateau in an equally run down part of Bordeaux and invited me to a party. It turned out to be a subtle press ganging of friends and acquaintances to pick their first crop! This was 1972. For vinous historians amongst you, this was around the time of the famous Cruz / Beart scandal – they were caught doing what was widely practised - “beefing” up the local wine with wines from further south, in fact often so much further south that they had to cross the Med on their way to Bordelaise vats. The significance of this was that Bordeaux was enjoying a great boom after the difficult years of the late 60’s, thanks to the 1970 vintage. So successful was the 1970 campaign that the Bordelaise repeated the trick with the less good 1971, and then went for the hat trick with the decidedly damp squib of 1972. Once the market, which by now was up to the rafters in stock, got wind of the scandal the market crashed. The next few years were characterised by tumbleweed bowling down the Quais de Chartrons rather than new Mercedes. Back to the point; my friends had done all their sums based on the heady market in which they acquired their chateau. By the time the first vintage was picked they realised they were in for a long slog. I slogged along with them for three years.

Where does you vinous heart lie?
Small producers that push the limits.

What is next for Simon Farr?
Even through its nearly 30 years since I started Bibendum, I am constantly amazed at how interesting and different the company continues to be. Essentially, that is mostly down to hiring the smartest, noisiest and most passionate people we can. Also, the wine world is changing. I think we entering a value over volume era after the pre-recession madness of volume over value. Wine should be a good deal better as a result. Also, the renaissance of the independent wine merchant is a very welcome phenomenon.

If you could drink one wine for the rest of your life, what would it be?
I don’t think I would want to live very long with only one wine!

Aside from wine, what is your favourite drink?
Water – so underrated, but rarely good!

Name three people, real or fictional, living or dead, that would be your dream dinner party guests and what would you be drinking?
Warren Buffet – anyone that rich who gives it all away and doesn’t want his name above the door is my kind of guy. Also, I love people that are successful but keep it simple. Miles Davis – cool doesn’t get close. Pranav Mistry – a young guy with a game changing idea (look him up on TED). Warren would have Cherry Coke, Miles a Martini, Pranav would surprise me, and (to end on a pretentious note) I would hog a bottle of Vieux Chateau Certan 1928!

Bibendum Wine Website

By Peter Wood with 1 comment

Thursday, 21 October 2010

#266 Granny's Christmas Tipple


There are two sherries that are staples in any Granny's drinks cabinet over the Christmas period.  Inevitably, they have been there, opened, since last Christmas, but without fail, just before 3pm on December 25th, a wee glass will be poured of either Harvey's Bristol Cream or Croft Original to toast Her Majesty.  And then the bottle shall go back into the drinks cupboard for another year, to continue its path to being oxidised to hell!

But when did any of you winey folk actually try Bristol Cream or Croft?  I can't ever recall trying them, so today I opened one of each and gave them a shot.

Harvey's Bristol Cream
A light, slightly caramel and raisin aroma, very simple, but not at all bad.  The palate is simple, a bit of a nutty, burnt sugar flavour.  There isn't much acid to clear up your palate, but the finish isn't bad at all, with dried fruit, dried peel and nuts galore with just a touch of alcohol heat.  To be honest, it is a decent enough sherry for a tenner.  6/10

Croft Original
This is crude.  It has a dry sherry aroma, a minerally, salty element, but with a big dose of wet labrador on it too. The palate starts off being salty and minerally, but a horrible sweetness comes in, as if someone had dumped a bundle of Tate & Lyle into a bottle of Tio Pepe.  The finish kicks off salty, but then has a cloy, sweet element that reminds me of when you suck an artificial sweetener.  It is a real mess of a wine.  3.5/10

The unfortunate thing is that if you try Harvey's Bristol Cream from a bar or your granny's cupboard, the chances are it is going to have been open for weeks (if not years) so you won't get it at its best.  I dread to think what the Croft will be like....

By Peter Wood with No comments

Wednesday, 20 October 2010

#265 Just say no

I recently panned Tesco's lower priced wines, so to make sure that I strike a balance, I should make you all aware that Tesco has some higher priced wines available online, from a company called Tim Adams.  And they aren't good either...

2008 Tim Adams Semillon
A honey and melon aroma that starts off quite nice, but then the palate is like muddy grass.  Pretty poor and not worth the tenner you are paying for a bottle. 6/10

2007 Tim Adams Shiraz
For eleven pounds you want a shiraz that has fresh, dark fruit, a lot of pepper and spice and some complexity.  This tastes of tablet!  A sweet, buttery, creamy wine, some jammy fruit, but it is mainly all about the fudge like aroma.  And the palate is the same!  A colleague said you almost got the gritty texture that you get from Scottish tablet, and he was right.  5/10

2006 Tim Adams 'The Fergus'
A blend of Grenache, Cabernet Sauvignon, Shiraz, Malbec and Cabernet Franc.  And it smells of urinal cubes. 3/10

2006 Tim Adams Aberfeldy
Their high end shiraz, which basically tastes like the basic shiraz, just with slightly better quality fudge.  To be fair, it has a slight pepper element, and a little acid, but it is at most a £15 wine.  And it costs a tenner more than that.  Pass.  5/10

If you want to buy these wines, you can get them at Tesco

p.s. I have just done a bit of research on these, and apparently Oz Clarke rates the 2007 Shiraz as one of his 250 best wines of 2011 in his new book.  Also, James Halliday says that the 2008 Semillon is a 94pt wine.  So don't just take my word for this! 

By Peter Wood with 6 comments

Tuesday, 12 October 2010

#264 Chasing the pound of port

I’m not keen on this.  Not keen at all.

Taylors, the legendary port house, have released a port called Scion and it has got me worried.  Earlier this year two pipes of port were discovered by David Guimaraens, the company’s head winemaker, in a private cellar which date from the 1850s, and a third that was apparently owned by the British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill.  It is this third barrel that has been bottled and will be on the shelves of Harrods and Nickolls & Perks in December. 

Now that is all fine, I’m sure that Churchill would hate to see booze being left undrunk but what bothers me is the price of £2500 per bottle, not because I can’t afford it, but for a much more worrying reason.

If we look at the whisky market for a moment, every so often a distillery will release some old, rare whisky and put a price tag of many thousands of pounds on it.  They argue that it is because of the rarity and cost a lot to produce, that they only get 50 bottles or that it has a hand blown crystal bottle that has been polished with the breath of twelve Mongolian virgins.  The real reason is that they charge this amount because they can, and it makes them a pot load of cash.  There is a market for uber expensive whisky, predominantly in the far east, and whisky makers know that this collectors market is very lucrative. 

We can also see that Bordeaux too has taken off in the far east, and wines that were once attainable to the average punter are now strictly off limits due to their huge prices, but vintage port has always remained affordable.  The nature of vintage port is that only the best three vintages every decade are released to the market place so there is a natural scarcity of the regions best wines.  Yet prices haven’t skyrocketed.  Even the poorest port fan can save up enough money to buy a half case of the best that Taylors or Grahams can offer every few years.

There are expensive older vintages of port, and old Tawnies, that have always pottered along selling in wine merchants all over the world, certainly commanding high prices, but never being marketed by the port house, and therefore these wines have remained within the realms and clutches of port buffs.

My worry, as a port fan, is that port producers want their category to go the same way as whisky or Bordeaux, and become a collectable, highly commercialized market.  This release from Taylors might be the first major step towards that.  The high price point of two and a half thousand pounds, plus the Churchill link, will generate a bit of a buzz around this wine, and will attract the attention of collectors.  I just hope that the resale price for this wine is less than its release price and that vintage port remains, for a bit longer, a fine wine that enthusiastic drinkers can afford.
Sarah Ahmed's The Wine Detective

By Peter Wood with 3 comments

Monday, 11 October 2010

#263 Six Questions with... Peter Franus

Despite starting off with a degree in journalism, Peter Franus, from Connecticut, was drawn from his possible career as a scribe to the enology and viticulture program at Cal State Fresno in 1978.  Inspired by his time working for Mount Veeder Winery, he launched his first wine, a Zinfandel, in 1987.  Buying grapes from the best growers, Franus and his assistant winemaker Jeff Keene, make outstanding wines, of which I think the Mourvedre is a must try.  We asked him six questions...

What would you do if you weren't in the wine trade?
So many possibilities that I haven't a clue

Aside from your own wines, what do you like drinking on a regular basis?
Aromatic white wines

What is the best, and worst, wine you have ever made?
It is impossible to answer!

Describe yourself in three words
Engaging, Elusive, Romantic

What is the best wine you have ever tried?
I haven't had it yet

Name three people, real or fictional, living or dead, that would be your dream dinner party guests.
Marilyn Monroe, Kurt Vonnegut, Sir Patrick Stewart

Peter Franus Wines

By Peter Wood with No comments

Tuesday, 5 October 2010

#262 Six of the Best? Tesco



I started this column about 2 years ago and it got as far as... well, one store, which was Lidl.  So I thought it would be a good idea to bring it back and relaunch it with the biggest supermarket in the UK - Tesco.

Here we are going to rate six bottles of wine from a wine retailer. There are a few rules to this, all of which aim to make sure we do the customer and the retailer justice.
1. The wines have to contain words on the label that even the most extreme wine novice has probably heard of. Words like Cabernet Sauvignon, Rioja, Bordeaux, Jacobs Creek, Penfolds are the sort of thing that have to be on the label.
2. There have to be an equal number of reds and whites, so if there is an appealing looking sparkling wine, we have to have only 2 red, 2 white, 1 fizzy and something else.
3. Where possible, we will get someone with bugger all wine knowledge to venture into the retailer to buy these, just to keep things fair.
4. The total cost of all six bottles cannot exceed forty pounds (for Lidl it was £30, but we have changed it to give independent retailers a chance.)

We will give marks out of ten for each wine, and bonus points for them performing well above their price point. If a bottle of plonk costs three quid and tastes like it should be a fiver, it beats a wine that costs and is worth a fiver. Not very scientific but we don’t give a stuff….


2009 Jacob’s Creek Sauvignon Blanc  £4.95
If you can imagine what lemon flour would smell like, this is it!  It has a dusty citrus aroma but then with an aggressive lemon curd element.  The palate is violently acidic, a great big swift kick to the nads, lots of sweet citrus – Swizzles lollipops – and then another acidic kick to the gentleman’s area.  3/10

2008 Tesco’s Finest Chablis Cuvee Claude Dominique £6.35
Off lemon yogurt on the nose and that is about it.   The palate starts of fat and sweet, ok, but not what Chablis is about.  Then it has searing acidity that just strips your mouth out.  This is horrible.  0/10

2008 Tesco’s Finest White Burgundy Chardonnay £4.98
Very little aroma, melon pith and just a hint of apple.  The palate is ok at first, with acceptable fruit, although again, a bit sweet, and then it has a load of acid kicking in.  It is the least offensive of the three whites.  3.5/10

2007 Piccini Gran Selezione Oro Chianti Riserva £7.11
A savoury element at first but then parma violets come through, a bit of cherry drops on the nose too.  The palate is more savoury, it does have sweet fruit but it is definitely Italian, although the gitload of coffee liqueur on the finish is a bit off putting.  4.5/10

2005 Berberana Reserva Rioja £7.11
Sweet jam, creamy, lots of chocolate and a bit of oranges stuffed with cloves.  The palate is ok at first, but then rapidly deteriorates to a flabby, meaty mess.  Tannins aren’t overpowering though, but the sweetness is.  This could be labeled as “generic red wine” for all the sense of place that it shows.  3/10

2008 Hardys Crest Cabernet Shiraz £7.11
Cassis – lots of overly sweet cassis.  Then you do get a little bit of green pepper.  This is horrifically sweet, but you do get the spicy black pepper element.  It is horrible.  1/10

TESCO SCORES 15/60

The Chart
1. Lidl (20/60)
2. Tesco (15/60)

By Peter Wood with 1 comment