Tuesday, 19 June 2012

#486 Beer vs Champagne


I tried two drinks on one day that could not be more different.  One was a champagne, the other a beer.  One is, possibly, the most famous brand ever, the other few will have heard about outside of a fifty mile radius of where I live.  One is named after the man who taught the world about secondary fermentation, the other named after a small town on the east coast of Scotland and one is made by the largest champagne house, owned by a fashion label and the other in an industrial unit by a man called Bob.

I've mentioned The St Andrews Brewing Company, owned by Yorkshireman Bob Phaff, before and he has just released a one off beer for a food festival in the town of Crail.  I was expecting a decent offering from Bob - that is what beer companies do when they produce a special edition beer - but not one that stood out from the range.  

Then there was Dom Perignon, the prestige cuvee that owners LVMH appears to be distancing away from parent company Moet & Chandon and establishing it as a stand alone brand.  Usually the wines are examples of exquisite poise, precision and balance, and only improve with time.  It was the champagne I started with.

2003 Dom Perignon
It had bright minerally aromas with gentle lemon zest and a tiny bit of diluted lemon juice.  Chalk comes through as well, but it is not 'classic' Dom Perignon.  With a bit of time in the glass it opens up, revealing more citrus pith and citrus flesh aromas.  The palate is soft, and quite flabby.  It has some sweeter lemon flavours, a bit of flint and then some pear coming off and then some nasty bitter note on the finish.  It is a pretty poor Dom Perignon.  75pts

St Andrews Brewing Company Crail Ale
Sweet caramel and some herbal notes coming off. A little malty element coming off and some rather nice burnt cream aroma.  The palate is delicious - soft and creamy in texture, a lovely bright maltiness, hints of Highland Toffee with a gentle floral bitterness.  A stonking bottle of beer.  91pts

The beer was a tremendous effort, and is my favourite beer created by this new brewer, and the Champagne was a tremendous flop, showing nothing that I want from a bottle of Dom Perignon.  I realised one more thing that was different between these two drinks.  One cost fifty times as much as the other, but the cheaper bottle was fifty times more desirable.



By Peter Wood with No comments

0 comments: